In addition to identifying PD as
early as possible, being able to identify those with a more severe,
rapidly-progressing form of the disease would help with deciding who should be
entered into clinical trials of disease-modifying therapies.
Longitudinal studies of patients
with PD (such as the CamPaIGN study) have shown that while some patients with
PD may have ‘good’ outcomes (no dementia or postural instability) even 10 years
after their diagnosis, others may progress much more rapidly to getting
dementia or postural instability [1].
This second group with a more
rapidly-progressing underlying disease process, would be the ideal group with
which to trial new potentially disease-modifying therapies, whereas those with
a more ‘benign’ form of PD are likely to do well with dopaminergic based
therapies.
Therefore, being able to predict whether
a patient will have a benign or rapidly-progressing disease course is
important, not only for patients’ and their families’ own information, but also
to optimise who gets what treatment.
Luckily, the CamPaIGN study
managed to identify a few factors which predict a rapid progression to
Parkinson’s disease dementia, including:
- Age
- Poor semantic fluency [1] – reduced ability to name as many animals as possible from memory in 90 seconds
- Poor overlapping pentagon drawing – poor ability to replicate the overlapping
- Having two copies of the H1 variant of the gene ‘MAPT’. This encodes a protein called ‘Tau’ which has been implicated in a number of neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer’s [2]
- Having a single abnormal copy of the GBA gene. ALL the patients with a single GBA mutation in the CamPaiGN study developed dementia by 8 years. (GBA is a gene which causes Gaucher’s disease when two mutated copies are inherited. People with a single mutation do not develop Gaucher’s and are otherwise healthy, they are known to have an increased risk of developing PD)
This is a great example of how
epidemiological evidence can inform clinical practice (by allowing doctors to
more accurately assess prognosis), add to our understanding of the mechanisms
of disease (in this case, by suggest a role for Tau in the pathology of
Parkinson’s disease dementia) and help optimise our efforts to find new
treatments for a disease (by helping to select the best patients for trials of
new therapies).
References:
The ability to recognise that there are different types of PD means that we can better stratify them which will have enormous implications as we move towards an era of more experimental, and possibly more invasive, therapies.
ReplyDelete