Wednesday 15 November 2017

To D or not to D, that is the question


At medical school we learned about the role that vitamin D has in bone metabolism, including its transformation from a less active form made by the kidneys to the more active form, which requires adequate sunlight on the skin. Low levels would lead to rickets in children, and osteomalacia in adults. Northern climes were associated with fair skin to allow more of the active vitamin D to be made in the ‘weaker’ sunshine, and that between October and March, even the fairest skinned amongst us would be unable to get enough natural sunshine (I was at medical school in Sheffield).

Since then however, there seems to have been some “mission creep”. Vitamin D now has been associated with countless conditions that seem to have nothing to do with calcium and phosphate turnover. Low levels are associated with worse response to TB treatment; vitamin D supplements are given in the community to people with non-specific aches, pains and low levels of depression; low vitamin D increases your risk of stroke and heart attack.

The brain diseases are involved too. People with MS are exhorted to take on extra vitamin D; low vitamin D levels are associated with a higher incidence of dementia. There is clearly much we have to learn about this intruiging compound, and its functions are clearly much more complex than has previously been thought.

What about Parkinson’s disease? There are several ongoing studies of prodromal Parkinson’s disease – research identifying people who have the underlying process that causes PD, but haven’t yet developed the full motor manifestations that are necessary for the clinical diagnosis. PREDICT-PD is one (and although we are partial, we think it's the best one), but the PRIPS study in Europe and the PARS study in North America are also very well designed studies that are reporting key discoveries in the fight against Parkinson’s.

An article this week reported on the levels of vitamin D in participants of the PARS study. The authors compared those thought to be at high risk of PD based on poor smell and abnormal DaT scans (a kind of brain scan that looks at dopamine transporters) and found no differences between the two groups.

At the moment, therefore, there is no justification for recommending taking vitamin D supplements to reduce your risk of PD. On the other hand, as many of our blog posts have highlighted, getting out and about, and doing some exercise in the sunshine, or even taking a nice holiday to escape the brisk British November greyness, might well do you good!

RNR

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28984598

J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;60(3):989-997. doi: 10.3233/JAD-170407.
Vitamin D and the Risk of Dementia: The Rotterdam Study.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Vitamin D has gained interest as a potentially modifiable risk factor for dementia because of its putative neuroprotective effects. However, longitudinal studies examining the association between vitamin D and dementia have provided inconsistent results.
OBJECTIVE:
To determine the relationship of serum vitamin D with prevalent and incident dementia in the general population.
METHODS:
Within the prospective Rotterdam Study, we measured serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations between 1997 and 2001 using electrochemiluminescence-immunoassay in 6220 participants 55 years or older. We assessed dementia at baseline and continuously during follow-up until 1 January 2015. We used appropriate regression models to determine the relationship of vitamin D with prevalent and incident dementia, including Alzheimer's disease (AD). We adjusted models for age, sex, and season of blood collection. Additionally, we adjusted for ethnicity, education, cardiovascular risk factors, serum calcium, kidney function, depression, outdoor-activity and APOEɛ4 carriership.
RESULTS:
At baseline, 127 of 6,220 participants had dementia, of whom 97 had AD. Lower vitamin D concentrations were associated with a non-significantly higher prevalence of dementia (adjusted OR, per SD decrease 1.20, 95% CI 0.95;1.52), but not with AD (adjusted OR: 0.97, 95% CI 0.74;1.29). Among 6,087 non-demented participants with 68,884 person-years of follow-up, 795 participants developed dementia, of whom 641 had AD. Lower vitamin D concentrations were associated with higher risk of dementia (adjusted HR, per SD decrease 1.11, 95% CI 1.02;1.20) and AD (adjusted HR: 1.13, 95% CI 1.03;1.24).
CONCLUSION:
Lower serum vitamin D concentrations are associated with a higher incidence of dementia.




No comments:

Post a Comment

Mild Parkinsonian Signs in a Community Population

One question that many of the PREDICT-PD participants ask me is “I am slower than I used to be, does it mean that I am getting Parkinson’...